Overall, I was really impressed with Bruce Conforth’s talk, and him as a person. Somehow, he manages to be a musician, author, and professor all at the same time. Plus, he used to study fine arts. As Conforth mentioned, no one before him has written a biography of Robert Johnson, so I admire how he has taken on such a daunting talk. He also discussed how writers before him thought there wasn’t enough information to write one, but he ended up digging and finding enough. One topic he talked about that piqued my interest was how the line between academic and fiction writing is blurring. At one point, Conforth said, “Writing is about who you are, we are all stories,” which I thought was both through-provoking and accurate. He stated, also accurately in my opinion, “You can’t write if you don’t read.” When he was describing the literature he liked himself, I though Conforth did a great job, and actually made me want to read it.
For Conforth, music and writing are not just two things he does. For him, they are related. Like Conforth, I also believe in a deep link between music and writing. From a very basic point of view, both are manipulations of words to get a desired effect. However, I don't think there's a place where music ends and works of literature begin. Some books are lyrical, and some albums tell a story. For instance, the
Illiad, which I would probably consider my favorite book, is widely considered poetry. Historically, though, the text was sung. Another example is the idea of a concept album, when musical artist crafts lyrics according to a plot, story, or theme, and sets them to music. Music and literature have both sprouted from the same source, they've just branched off into different directions. The stories that musicians tell about their lives, or other, fictional lives in their music can, for me, be just as interesting as works of literature.