The effects of graffiti on the city of Detroit have been both a blessing and a curse. This art, that is in many ways revitalizing the city by putting hope in its inhabitants and drawing tourists that bring in big money, is also sometimes an illegal act of property damage and vandalism. This war on graffiti has been an ongoing battle between artists, writers, admirers, protestors, and lawmakers since it’s inception. The legality of their act is inconsequential to these writers, as long as their message is clear. Street art inspires or enrages, it sparks emotion and thought, it demands to be seen. “Is it illegal art? Yes,” said Matt Eaton, director-curator of the Red Bull house of Art in Eastern Market and a longtime champion of street art. “Does that take away from its relevance as social commentary? No!” ’ (A Street Art Culture Clash as Graffiti Goes Mainstream, Mark Stryker). This mindset is what has led to the strong tension between the law and graffiti writers, and is what ultimately gets graffiti writers into trouble. This tension has disturbed the inner peace of the city and has given Detroit a negative reputation with the rest of the country. Simultaneously, however, this art has given Detroiters hope by expressing the inner thoughts many share regarding the city’s situation.
I think "agreeing to disagree" is a reasonable action in this graffiti argument. My opinions won't necessarily change yours, just as someone else's might not change mine.
ReplyDelete